[ad_1]
Top line
The Supreme Court will consider how much tech companies can legally be held liable for content published on its platforms, the court announced Monday, in a case that could challenge whether Google was wrong to recommend YouTube videos it helped support. Encouraging ISIS recruitment.
Key facts
The court agreed to take Gonzalez and Google, who brought the father of a woman killed in the 2015 Paris terror attack in Georgia, alleging that Google helped recruit ISIS.[ing] ISIS videos for users.
Under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, social media companies have so far been shielded from legal liability for content posted by users on the platform, as long as no computer service provider “shall be deemed the publisher or speaker of any information.” Another content provider, ie the users.
The case asks whether the Supreme Court’s Section 230 protections should include video tips aimed at social media platforms — appeals courts have previously been divided — or whether content published on the platforms should only be legally protected.
Important quote
“Interactive computer services direct such suggestions to all adults and children in the United States in one way or another,” attorneys for plaintiff Reynaldo Gonzalez wrote in their Supreme Court petition in the case. “Section 230’s application to such recommendations would eliminate all incentives for civil liability for interactive computer services recommendations … harmful materials and would deny recourse to victims who demonstrate that those recommendations caused injury or the death of their loved ones,” he said.
This story is breaking and will be updated.
[ad_2]
Source link