[ad_1]
noIn recent years, many health care professionals have been confronting challenging chapters in their institutions’ histories, as communities increasingly grapple with how to deal with past institutional traumas. Be it problematic medical trials; abuse of power; systematic patterns of neglect, discrimination or racism; or funders with questionable resources, many institutions now have to reckon with their past.
Some of these abuses will be presented in the courts. In other cases, institutions may be required to provide significant indicators of improvement.
Small clinics in medical education or practice provide excellent preparation for addressing such challenges. At the same time, leaders can expect to be challenged if they fail to address these issues. When errors occur in the process, reputation affects staff morale and patient confidence. So how can health professionals deal with it? Complex artifacts?
advertisement
A structured ethical framework can provide a logical solution to address the multifaceted nature of public sentiment. of The ethics of political memory It provides a framework that can be increasingly used in other contexts to address both national and local memory challenges. Ethics here means that at least one person is looking for sustainable arrangements. The presentation identifies the question That is To remember loss and damage in consideration of why to remember.
The standards were developed in part by Only the culture of war. This ethical framework, developed over centuries, seeks to limit the use of energy. He emphasizes that action should be focused on creating a better future, and stresses the need to respect and care for each other, which is also a sensible approach to commemoration. One indication of the reach and impact of this tradition is that, according to the International Committee of the Red Cross, they are key aspects of the just war tradition. merged to international humanitarian law. So is this framework. It is mentioned in the medical literature.
advertisement
As a first step against institutional shock, the ethics of political commemoration is one of the main focuses of eius ad memoriam (better translated as “memorial may be justified”). Purpose Memorial. For most medical facilities, this means the facility will do its best to reassure patients, staff and the wider community. This usually involves accepting suffering as a part of doing things differently.
The process of addressing historical challenges must be based on a legitimate mandate that engages diverse voices, from groups that have been harmed in the past to existing stakeholders and those committed to the future of the institution. Top-down decision-making is not enough to address the trauma of the past. Time is needed for people to share their stories and contributions and for proper reflection.
At the same time, any ideas should have a reasonable chance of success at a reasonable level of effort. Ideas to solve the problems of the past are of little use if they are associated with caring for society in the present.
Secondly, Ius in Memoria (better known as “how the memorial should be carried out”), institutions can consider how to solve institutional harms.
In medical and other institutions, the commemoration should create a strong sense of “us” that is all-encompassing and does not stretch to – or repeat – an “us with them” style, to make it clear that everyone currently working in the institution is commemorating others many years or decades from now. He must be able to recognize the memory of the trauma rather than feeling it is a recollection of his previous actions. Remembrance should help institutions work better, not create new differences or operational deficiencies.
The ambivalence it contains is another ethical requirement of a sensible political memorial, clever as the phrase may seem at first. When it comes to past abuse, it’s important to identify a date and place to hold what happened. At the same time, it’s important to acknowledge that it’s difficult to fathom the “infinite absence that follows,” as writer Joan Didion described her devastating loss in her book, “The Year of Magical Thinking.” For this reason, it may be reasonable to keep the number of victims in broad categories such as “dozens” or “hundreds”. In most cases, it can be difficult to confirm the exact number of victims. The accounting of cause and effect is properly the task of historians, not memorials.
Many institutions have found that wisdom is central to acknowledging past trauma. For example, Helios in Berlin-Buch, Germany has a clinic. Art installation By Argentine-born artist Patricia Pisani in the middle of the medical campus in memory of the patients killed by the Nazis in this and other places. Art allows for multiple interpretations and can speak where words can fail. As seen in the Berlin-Buch clinic, the process of integrating such memorials in institutions and public spaces, often as a part. Open competitionIt can be an opportunity for collective reflection.
Ultimately, the memorial should help individuals assert their moral freedom and emphasize the role that each individual has to play in order for institutions to continue. For this reason, a reasonable focus may be on those who helped correct the errors.
By applying this comprehensive ethical framework to institutional crisis, institutions can address the most challenging chapters they have ever faced. Leaders in large institutions may have the resources to maintain professional support and commissions, but with this framework of guidance, small institutions can take healing measures. There is not always agreement, but there can be a process of acknowledging and accounting for different points of view.
If institutions are approached with care and honesty, they can emerge from such calculations with a solid foundation of trust. Institutions that are said to be taking the right steps in light of past mistakes will strengthen staff morale and strengthen patient trust and community support, which will ultimately contribute to financial performance.
Because dealing with past trauma is an emergent concern in society, health care professionals can help their institutions address these issues. And the broader healthcare community may want to highlight examples of how the past has been handled well. Sharing examples like these can help institutions acknowledge their past, and hopefully move toward a better future.
Hans Gutbrod is an associate professor at Ilia State University in Tbilisi, Georgia, and a senior fellow at the Center for Peace and Conflict Studies at Seton Hall University in South Orange.
[ad_2]
Source link
