[ad_1]
In Roe v. Wade, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled: He wanted it. “Bring the abortion issue back to the people’s elected representatives.” Following the court’s decision, state courts contested whether state pro-life laws were valid under state constitutions. What is happening now is the federal government’s efforts to co-operate with pro-abortion states to classify abortion as “health care” and create a national state by merging the national pill-based abortion market. Pro-life laws are ineffective. This approach is also dishonest and dangerous for women.
According to the federal government, abortion is no longer a tragic process “Well, legal and rare“-“Health Care.” Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently Released An online ad advises women that abortion is “an important part of your health and well-being.” US Department of Justice He promised. “Protect Health Care Providers and Individuals Seeking Reproductive Health Services.” Even President Biden has joined the renaming campaign. Issuance of executive orders It defines “reproductive health care services” as “services related to pregnancy or termination of pregnancy.”
Calling abortion “health care” is very dishonest. Abortion does not involve disease; It disrupts normal and healthy biological processes by killing the unborn. As a combination of Hippocratic medicine He puts it.Abortion is “an act with the sole purpose of ending human life” and “clearly violates the basic principles of medical ethics.”
After reinventing abortion, its proponents decided to offer their new version of health care to women through online-ordered and mail-order abortion pills. On July 8, President Biden where given Executive Order 14,076 of HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra called for the identification of possible measures to “protect and expand access to abortion services, including medical abortions.” “Medicine abortion” is, of course, a term for pill-induced chemical abortions, particularly mifepristone (RU-486).
In announcing the move, the White House said, “The HHS Secretary builds on the President’s directive to ensure that medical abortion is as widely available as possible.” “Previous measures” include removing the requirement to distribute mifepristone in the body Already on the spot Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Drug Safety Program for identified serious safety concerns. As a result, HHS confirmed the federal regulations Allow chemical abortion drugs “Distributed by telehealth and mailed through verified prescriptions and pharmacies.”
HHS response to Biden’s executive order issued a guidance document In the year On July 13, a federal law prohibits pharmacies from discriminating against pregnant women, “increasing their ability to obtain reproductive health care, including prescription drugs, from their pharmacy.” Mifepristone is among the drugs specifically mentioned in the guidelines. Attorney General Merrick Garland followed this up press release Governments cannot ban Mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA’s expert judgment.
The move stems from the Biden administration’s push for federal policy to make chemical abortions as widely available as possible by waiving physical requirements for mifepristone and telling pharmacies they could be held liable for refusing to dispense it.
Chemical abortion “health care” is deadly to unborn babies, of course. But the reckless intent of abortion advocates to rebrand and rapidly expand chemical abortion on demand also harms thousands of women. Studies have shown that chemical abortions have a level of complexity four times Surgical abortions in the first trimester.
Moreover, in the year Life threatening problems It is more common to use Mifepristone for more than 10 weeks during pregnancy. But many women misunderstand the stage of their pregnancy. And using mifepristone can be dangerous, especially with ectopic pregnancy. For those reasons, the pro-life American Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists He warns “Physical visits are an important and valid medical practice because they ensure that each woman receives a full evaluation of any contraindications to medical abortion.”
This will lead to the Biden administration’s most embarrassing move of all: reinterpreting the Emergency Medicine and Labor Act (EMTALA) (a federal “anti-abortion” law that requires emergency rooms to deny care to uninsured patients who have a “medical emergency”) to provide abortions. The EMTALA guidelines were drafted as necessary to prevent doctors from refusing to treat true emergencies such as ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage. But doctors have been treating those emergencies for a long time, and pro-life laws won’t change that. For example, Texas law excludes abortion from abortion and the removal of ectopic pregnancy. So did Planned Parenthood — until it revamped its website after the EMTALA guidelines were released.
The actual contribution of EMTALA Directive According to the burgeoning chemical abortion economy, emergency departments are required to treat “incomplete medical abortions” within their capacity. That requirement provides a dark backdrop for the thousands of women who seek mifepristone through telehealth, online or by mail order and experience botched chemical abortions. The guidelines tell emergency room doctors to “get the job done.” Sadly, even in cases where the unborn child can be saved.
Every part of the federal government’s efforts – From reintroducing abortion to interpreting federal law to force a national chemical abortion market into existence – It rests on shaky rational and legal grounds. It’s being litigated in part in court, including by my organization, Alliance Defending Freedom. If women’s health (an unnamed and deadly federal “health service”) is to truly be protected and the people’s elected representatives to finally have a voice, it is imperative to oppose those efforts.
Ryan Bangert is a senior consultant. A union that defends freedom (@ADFLegal).
[ad_2]
Source link
